Papers › Phishing URL Detection Through Top-level Domain Analysis: A Descriptive Approach

Phishing URL Detection Through Top-level Domain Analysis: A Descriptive Approach

13 May 2020arXiv:2005.06599archive 2025-07-28

Orestis Christou, Nikolaos Pitropakis, Pavlos Papadopoulos, Sean McKeown, William J. Buchanan

Phishing is considered to be one of the most prevalent cyber-attacks because of its immense flexibility and alarmingly high success rate. Even with adequate training and high situational awareness, it can still be hard for users to continually be aware of the URL of the website they are visiting. Traditional detection methods rely on blocklists and content analysis, both of which require time-consuming human verification. Thus, there have been attempts focusing on the predictive filtering of such URLs. This study aims to develop a machine-learning model to detect fraudulent URLs which can be used within the Splunk platform. Inspired from similar approaches in the literature, we trained the SVM and Random Forests algorithms using malicious and benign datasets found in the literature and one dataset that we created. We evaluated the algorithms' performance with precision and recall, reaching up to 85% precision and 87% recall in the case of Random Forests while SVM achieved up to 90% precision and 88% recall using only descriptive features.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Descriptive

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SVM

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections