Papers › Personalizing Federated Medical Image Segmentation via Local Calibration

Personalizing Federated Medical Image Segmentation via Local Calibration

11 Jul 2022arXiv:2207.04655archive 2025-07-28

Jiacheng Wang, Yueming Jin, Liansheng Wang

Medical image segmentation under federated learning (FL) is a promising direction by allowing multiple clinical sites to collaboratively learn a global model without centralizing datasets. However, using a single model to adapt to various data distributions from different sites is extremely challenging. Personalized FL tackles this issue by only utilizing partial model parameters shared from global server, while keeping the rest to adapt to its own data distribution in the local training of each site. However, most existing methods concentrate on the partial parameter splitting, while do not consider the \textit{inter-site in-consistencies} during the local training, which in fact can facilitate the knowledge communication over sites to benefit the model learning for improving the local accuracy. In this paper, we propose a personalized federated framework with \textbf{L}ocal \textbf{C}alibration (LC-Fed), to leverage the inter-site in-consistencies in both \textit{feature- and prediction- levels} to boost the segmentation. Concretely, as each local site has its alternative attention on the various features, we first design the contrastive site embedding coupled with channel selection operation to calibrate the encoded features. Moreover, we propose to exploit the knowledge of prediction-level in-consistency to guide the personalized modeling on the ambiguous regions, e.g., anatomical boundaries. It is achieved by computing a disagreement-aware map to calibrate the prediction. Effectiveness of our method has been verified on three medical image segmentation tasks with different modalities, where our method consistently shows superior performance to the state-of-the-art personalized FL methods. Code is available at https://github.com/jcwang123/FedLC.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 9 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from jcwang123/FedLC. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections