Papers › Perceptual Quality Assessment of Colored 3D Point Clouds
Perceptual Quality Assessment of Colored 3D Point Clouds
Honglei Su, Qi Liu, Zhengfang Duanmu, Wentao Liu, Zhou Wang
The real-world applications of 3D point clouds have been growing rapidly in recent years, but not much effective work has been dedicated to perceptual quality assessment of colored 3D point clouds. In this work, we first build a large 3D point cloud database for subjective and objective quality assessment of point clouds. We construct 20 high quality, realistic, and omni-directional point clouds of diverse contents. We then apply downsampling, Gaussian noise, and three types of compression algorithms to create 740 distorted point clouds. We carry out a subjective experiment to evaluate the quality of distorted point clouds. Our statistical analysis finds that existing objective point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) models only achieve limited success in predicting subjective quality ratings. We propose a novel objective PCQA model based on the principle of information content weighted structural similarity. Our experimental results show that the proposed model well correlates with subjective opinions and significantly outperforms the existing PCQA models. The database has been made publicly available to facilitate reproducible research at https://github.com/qdushl/Waterloo-Point-Cloud-Database.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections