Papers › Does Peer-Reviewed Research Help Predict Stock Returns?
Does Peer-Reviewed Research Help Predict Stock Returns?
Andrew Y. Chen, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Tom Zimmermann
We examine the incremental information contained in economic research by leveraging unique features of the asset pricing literature. This field offers standardized performance measures, large scale replications, and naive data mining as an alternative to using economic research. We find that mining 29,000 accounting ratios for t-statistics over 2.0 leads to cross-sectional return predictability similar to peer-reviewed research. For both methods, about 50% of predictability remains after the original sample periods. Predictors supported by peer-reviewed risk explanations or equilibrium models underperform other predictors post-sample, suggesting peer review systematically mislabels mispricing as risk, though only 20% of predictors are labelled as risk. Data mining generates other features of economic research including the rise in returns as original sample periods end and the speed of post-sample decay. It also uncovers themes like investment, issuance, and accruals -- decades before they are published.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections