Papers › PECon: Contrastive Pretraining to Enhance Feature Alignment between CT and EHR Data...
PECon: Contrastive Pretraining to Enhance Feature Alignment between CT and EHR Data for Improved Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis
Santosh Sanjeev, Salwa K. Al Khatib, Mai A. Shaaban, Ibrahim Almakky, Vijay Ram Papineni, Mohammad Yaqub
Previous deep learning efforts have focused on improving the performance of Pulmonary Embolism(PE) diagnosis from Computed Tomography (CT) scans using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). However, the features from CT scans alone are not always sufficient for the diagnosis of PE. CT scans along with electronic heath records (EHR) can provide a better insight into the patients condition and can lead to more accurate PE diagnosis. In this paper, we propose Pulmonary Embolism Detection using Contrastive Learning (PECon), a supervised contrastive pretraining strategy that employs both the patients CT scans as well as the EHR data, aiming to enhance the alignment of feature representations between the two modalities and leverage information to improve the PE diagnosis. In order to achieve this, we make use of the class labels and pull the sample features of the same class together, while pushing away those of the other class. Results show that the proposed work outperforms the existing techniques and achieves state-of-the-art performance on the RadFusion dataset with an F1-score of 0.913, accuracy of 0.90 and an AUROC of 0.943. Furthermore, we also explore the explainability of our approach in comparison to other methods. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/BioMedIA-MBZUAI/PECon.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections