Papers › Patch Slimming for Efficient Vision Transformers
Patch Slimming for Efficient Vision Transformers
Yehui Tang, Kai Han, Yunhe Wang, Chang Xu, Jianyuan Guo, Chao Xu, DaCheng Tao
This paper studies the efficiency problem for visual transformers by excavating redundant calculation in given networks. The recent transformer architecture has demonstrated its effectiveness for achieving excellent performance on a series of computer vision tasks. However, similar to that of convolutional neural networks, the huge computational cost of vision transformers is still a severe issue. Considering that the attention mechanism aggregates different patches layer-by-layer, we present a novel patch slimming approach that discards useless patches in a top-down paradigm. We first identify the effective patches in the last layer and then use them to guide the patch selection process of previous layers. For each layer, the impact of a patch on the final output feature is approximated and patches with less impact will be removed. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can significantly reduce the computational costs of vision transformers without affecting their performances. For example, over 45% FLOPs of the ViT-Ti model can be reduced with only 0.2% top-1 accuracy drop on the ImageNet dataset.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | DPS-LV-ViT-S | GFLOPs | 4.5 | #12 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | DPS-LV-ViT-S | Top 1 Accuracy | 82.9 | #12 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | PS-LV-ViT-S | GFLOPs | 4.7 | #18 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (With LV-ViT-S) | PS-LV-ViT-S | Top 1 Accuracy | 82.4 | #18 of 19 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | DPS-ViT | GFLOPs | 2.4 | #20 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | DPS-ViT | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.5 | #20 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | PS-ViT | GFLOPs | 2.6 | #22 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-S) | PS-ViT | Top 1 Accuracy | 79.4 | #22 of 41 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | DPS-ViT | GFLOPs | 0.6 | #8 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | DPS-ViT | Top 1 Accuracy | 72.1 | #8 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | PS-ViT | GFLOPs | 0.7 | #11 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Efficient ViTs | ImageNet-1K (with DeiT-T) | PS-ViT | Top 1 Accuracy | 72.0 | #11 of 22 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections