Papers › Parallelizing Legendre Memory Unit Training
Parallelizing Legendre Memory Unit Training
Narsimha Chilkuri, Chris Eliasmith
Recently, a new recurrent neural network (RNN) named the Legendre Memory Unit (LMU) was proposed and shown to achieve state-of-the-art performance on several benchmark datasets. Here we leverage the linear time-invariant (LTI) memory component of the LMU to construct a simplified variant that can be parallelized during training (and yet executed as an RNN during inference), thus overcoming a well known limitation of training RNNs on GPUs. We show that this reformulation that aids parallelizing, which can be applied generally to any deep network whose recurrent components are linear, makes training up to 200 times faster. Second, to validate its utility, we compare its performance against the original LMU and a variety of published LSTM and transformer networks on seven benchmarks, ranging from psMNIST to sentiment analysis to machine translation. We demonstrate that our models exhibit superior performance on all datasets, often using fewer parameters. For instance, our LMU sets a new state-of-the-art result on psMNIST, and uses half the parameters while outperforming DistilBERT and LSTM models on IMDB sentiment analysis.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sentiment Analysis | IMDb | Modified LMU (34M) | Accuracy | 93.20 | #27 of 49 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sequential Image Classification | Sequential MNIST | Modified LMU (165k) | Permuted Accuracy | 98.49% | #6 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections