Papers › Parallel cross-validation: a scalable fitting method for Gaussian process models
Parallel cross-validation: a scalable fitting method for Gaussian process models
Florian Gerber, Douglas W. Nychka
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Gaussian process (GP) models are widely used to analyze spatially referenced data and to predict values at locations without observations. In contrast to many algorithmic procedures, GP models are based on a statistical framework, which enables uncertainty quantification of the model structure and predictions. Both the evaluation of the likelihood and the prediction involve solving linear systems. Hence, the computational costs are large and limit the amount of data that can be handled. While there are many approximation strategies that lower the computational cost of GP models, they often provide only sub-optimal support for the parallel computing capabilities of current (high-performance) computing environments. We aim at bridging this gap with a parameter estimation and prediction method that is designed to be parallelizable. More precisely, we divide the spatial domain into overlapping subsets and use cross-validation (CV) to estimate the covariance parameters in parallel. We present simulation studies, which assess the accuracy of the parameter estimates and predictions. Moreover, we show that our implementation has good weak and strong parallel scaling properties. For illustration, we fit an exponential covariance model to a scientifically relevant canopy height dataset with 5 million observations. Using 512 processor cores in parallel brings the evaluation time of one covariance parameter configuration to less than 1.5 minutes. The parallel CV method can be easily extended to include approximate likelihood methods, multivariate and spatio-temporal data, as well as non-stationary covariance models.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections