Papers › PanIC: consistent information criteria for general model selection problems
PanIC: consistent information criteria for general model selection problems
Hien Duy Nguyen
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Model selection is a ubiquitous problem that arises in the application of many statistical and machine learning methods. In the likelihood and related settings, it is typical to use the method of information criteria (IC) to choose the most parsimonious among competing models by penalizing the likelihood-based objective function. Theorems guaranteeing the consistency of IC can often be difficult to verify and are often specific and bespoke. We present a set of results that guarantee consistency for a class of IC, which we call PanIC (from the Greek root 'pan', meaning 'of everything'), with easily verifiable regularity conditions. The PanIC are applicable in any loss-based learning problem and are not exclusive to likelihood problems. We illustrate the verification of regularity conditions for model selection problems regarding finite mixture models, least absolute deviation and support vector regression, and principal component analysis, and we demonstrate the effectiveness of the PanIC for such problems via numerical simulations. Furthermore, we present new sufficient conditions for the consistency of BIC-like estimators and provide comparisons of the BIC to PanIC.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections