Papers › PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Model

PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Model

14 Sep 2022arXiv:2209.06794archive 2025-07-28

Xi Chen, Xiao Wang, Soravit Changpinyo, AJ Piergiovanni, Piotr Padlewski, Daniel Salz, Sebastian Goodman, Adam Grycner, Basil Mustafa, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Joan Puigcerver, Nan Ding, Keran Rong, Hassan Akbari, Gaurav Mishra, Linting Xue, Ashish Thapliyal, James Bradbury, Weicheng Kuo, Mojtaba Seyedhosseini, Chao Jia, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Carlos Riquelme, Andreas Steiner, Anelia Angelova, Xiaohua Zhai, Neil Houlsby, Radu Soricut

Effective scaling and a flexible task interface enable large language models to excel at many tasks. We present PaLI (Pathways Language and Image model), a model that extends this approach to the joint modeling of language and vision. PaLI generates text based on visual and textual inputs, and with this interface performs many vision, language, and multimodal tasks, in many languages. To train PaLI, we make use of large pre-trained encoder-decoder language models and Vision Transformers (ViTs). This allows us to capitalize on their existing capabilities and leverage the substantial cost of training them. We find that joint scaling of the vision and language components is important. Since existing Transformers for language are much larger than their vision counterparts, we train a large, 4-billion parameter ViT (ViT-e) to quantify the benefits from even larger-capacity vision models. To train PaLI, we create a large multilingual mix of pretraining tasks, based on a new image-text training set containing 10B images and texts in over 100 languages. PaLI achieves state-of-the-art in multiple vision and language tasks (such as captioning, visual question-answering, scene-text understanding), while retaining a simple, modular, and scalable design.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2209.06794")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

google-research/big_vision officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubjax report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
1ran
2unverified

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from google-research/big_vision. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Model google-research/big_vision/big_vision/models/proj/paligemma/paligemma.py official repository ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 264ee304ace700f9 · report
make_attn_mask google-research/big_vision/big_vision/models/proj/paligemma/paligemma.py official repository ran · violated contract fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 8841a31daa3af774 · report
combine_and_keep_eval google-research/big_vision/big_vision/configs/proj/paligemma/transfers/common.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 774022ae9ec0b97e · report
combine_and_keep_train google-research/big_vision/big_vision/configs/proj/paligemma/transfers/common.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · e56c7b7495cab683 · report

Tasks

DecoderFew-Shot Image ClassificationImage CaptioningImage ClassificationQuestion AnsweringVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)Visual ReasoningZero-Shot Image ClassificationZero-Shot Transfer Image Classificationmodel

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI CIDEr 149.1 #1 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI B1 88.02 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI B2 75.21 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI B3 59.38 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI B4 41.16 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI CIDEr 121.09 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI METEOR 34.22 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI ROUGE-L 64.39 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps in-domain PaLI SPICE 15.69 #4 of 41 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI B1 88.57 #2 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI B2 75.56 #2 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI B3 58.99 #2 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI B4 39.98 #2 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI CIDEr 124.35 #2 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI METEOR 33.47 #2 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI ROUGE-L 63.99 #2 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI SPICE 15.75 #2 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps near-domain PaLI SPICE 15.75 #40 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps out-of-domain PaLI B1 86.28 #1 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps out-of-domain PaLI B2 71.19 #1 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps out-of-domain PaLI B3 52.63 #1 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps out-of-domain PaLI B4 32.0 #1 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps out-of-domain PaLI CIDEr 126.67 #1 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps out-of-domain PaLI METEOR 30.99 #1 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps out-of-domain PaLI ROUGE-L 61.35 #1 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Captioning nocaps out-of-domain PaLI SPICE 15.49 #1 of 40 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet V2 ViT-e Top 1 Accuracy 84.3 #2 of 33 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ObjectNet ViT-e Top-1 Accuracy 72.0 #13 of 106 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering (VQA) OK-VQA PaLI 17B Accuracy 64.5 #4 of 37 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering (VQA) TextVQA test-standard PaLI overall 73.1 #1 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering (VQA) VQA v2 test-dev PaLI Accuracy 84.3 #1 of 56 Archive leaderboard report
Visual Question Answering (VQA) VizWiz 2020 VQA PaLI overall 73.3 #1 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet LiT ViT-e Accuracy (Private) 85.4 #6 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet PaLI Accuracy (Private) 72.11 #19 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet V2 LiT ViT-e Accuracy (Private) 80.6 #5 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet V2 PaLI Accuracy (Private) 64.46 #13 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet-A LiT ViT-e Accuracy (Private) 88.0 #3 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet-A PaLI Accuracy (Private) 44.7 #13 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet-R LiT ViT-e Accuracy 96.1 #3 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet-R PaLI Accuracy 81.97 #12 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet-S PaLI Accuracy (Private) 63.83 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet-S PaLI Top 5 Accuracy 79.3 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ObjectNet LiT ViT-e Accuracy (Private) 84.9 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ObjectNet PaLI Accuracy (Private) 42.62 #9 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ObjectNet PaLI Top 5 Accuracy 58.35 #9 of 9 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections