Papers › Pairwise Relations Discriminator for Unsupervised Raven's Progressive Matrices
Pairwise Relations Discriminator for Unsupervised Raven's Progressive Matrices
Nicholas Quek Wei Kiat, Duo Wang, Mateja Jamnik
The ability to hypothesise, develop abstract concepts based on concrete observations and apply these hypotheses to justify future actions has been paramount in human development. An existing line of research in outfitting intelligent machines with abstract reasoning capabilities revolves around the Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM). There have been many breakthroughs in supervised approaches to solving RPM in recent years. However, this process requires external assistance, and thus it cannot be claimed that machines have achieved reasoning ability comparable to humans. Namely, humans can solve RPM problems without supervision or prior experience once the RPM rule that relations can only exist row/column-wise is properly introduced. In this paper, we introduce a pairwise relations discriminator (PRD), a technique to develop unsupervised models with sufficient reasoning abilities to tackle an RPM problem. PRD reframes the RPM problem into a relation comparison task, which we can solve without requiring the labelling of the RPM problem. We can identify the optimal candidate by adapting the application of PRD to the RPM problem. Our approach, the PRD, establishes a new state-of-the-art unsupervised learning benchmark with an accuracy of 55.9% on the I-RAVEN, presenting a significant improvement and a step forward in equipping machines with abstract reasoning.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections