Papers › PAC-Bayes Un-Expected Bernstein Inequality

PAC-Bayes Un-Expected Bernstein Inequality

31 May 2019NeurIPS 2019 12arXiv:1905.13367archive 2025-07-28

Zakaria Mhammedi, Peter D. Grunwald, Benjamin Guedj

We present a new PAC-Bayesian generalization bound. Standard bounds contain a √(Lₙ ·/n) complexity term which dominates unless Lₙ, the empirical error of the learning algorithm's randomized predictions, vanishes. We manage to replace Lₙ by a term which vanishes in many more situations, essentially whenever the employed learning algorithm is sufficiently stable on the dataset at hand. Our new bound consistently beats state-of-the-art bounds both on a toy example and on UCI datasets (with large enough n). Theoretically, unlike existing bounds, our new bound can be expected to converge to $0$ faster whenever a Bernstein/Tsybakov condition holds, thus connecting PAC-Bayesian generalization and {\em excess risk\/} bounds---for the latter it has long been known that faster convergence can be obtained under Bernstein conditions. Our main technical tool is a new concentration inequality which is like Bernstein's but with X² taken outside its expectation.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

bguedj/PAC-Bayesian-Un-Expected-Bernstein-Inequality officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections