Papers › OVO: Open-Vocabulary Occupancy

OVO: Open-Vocabulary Occupancy

25 May 2023arXiv:2305.16133archive 2025-07-28

Zhiyu Tan, ZiChao Dong, Cheng Zhang, Weikun Zhang, Hang Ji, Hao Li

Semantic occupancy prediction aims to infer dense geometry and semantics of surroundings for an autonomous agent to operate safely in the 3D environment. Existing occupancy prediction methods are almost entirely trained on human-annotated volumetric data. Although of high quality, the generation of such 3D annotations is laborious and costly, restricting them to a few specific object categories in the training dataset. To address this limitation, this paper proposes Open Vocabulary Occupancy (OVO), a novel approach that allows semantic occupancy prediction of arbitrary classes but without the need for 3D annotations during training. Keys to our approach are (1) knowledge distillation from a pre-trained 2D open-vocabulary segmentation model to the 3D occupancy network, and (2) pixel-voxel filtering for high-quality training data generation. The resulting framework is simple, compact, and compatible with most state-of-the-art semantic occupancy prediction models. On NYUv2 and SemanticKITTI datasets, OVO achieves competitive performance compared to supervised semantic occupancy prediction approaches. Furthermore, we conduct extensive analyses and ablation studies to offer insights into the design of the proposed framework. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/dzcgaara/OVO.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from dzcgaara/OVO. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections