Papers › OverPrompt: Enhancing ChatGPT through Efficient In-Context Learning
OverPrompt: Enhancing ChatGPT through Efficient In-Context Learning
Jiazheng Li, Runcong Zhao, Yongxin Yang, Yulan He, Lin Gui
The remarkable performance of pre-trained large language models has revolutionised various natural language processing applications. Due to huge parametersizes and extensive running costs, companies or organisations tend to transfer the models to the target task by zero-shot prompting techniques. However, the prohibitive costs of tokens and time have hindered their adoption in applications. We propose OverPrompt, leveraging the in-context learning capability of LLMs to handle multiple task inputs, thereby reducing token and time costs. This approach could potentially improve task performance during API queries due to better conditional distribution mapping. Evaluated across diverse classification datasets, our experiments show that OverPrompt can achieve cost-efficient zero-shot classification without causing significant detriment to task performance, and in some cases, even improving it. An ablation study conducted on various LLMs, along with an investigation into the robustness of our prompting strategy to different input ordering, offers valuable insights into the broader applicability of our method across diverse tasks. These findings also suggest a more seamless integration of our method with LLMs through an API.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections