Papers › Overcoming timestep limitations in boosted-frame Particle-In-Cell simulations of...

Overcoming timestep limitations in boosted-frame Particle-In-Cell simulations of plasma-based acceleration

28 Apr 2021arXiv:2104.13995links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Olga Shapoval, Remi Lehe, Maxence Thévenet, Edoardo Zoni, Yinjian Zhao, Jean-Luc Vay

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Explicit electromagnetic Particle-In-Cell (PIC) codes are typically limited by the Courant- Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) condition, which implies that the timestep multiplied by the speed of light must be smaller than the smallest cell size. In the case of boosted-frame PIC simulations of plasma-based acceleration, this limitation can be a major hinderance as the cells are often very elongated along the longitudinal direction and the timestep is thus limited by the small, transverse cell size. This entails many small-timestep PIC iterations, and can limit the potential speed-up of the boosted-frame technique. Here, by using a CFL-free analytical spectral solver, and by mitigating additional numerical instabilities that arise at large timestep, we show that it is possible to overcome traditional limitations on the timestep and thereby realize the full potential of the boosted-frame technique over a much wider range of parameters.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ECP-WarpX/WarpX officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections