Papers › OSPtrack: A Labeled Dataset Targeting Simulated Execution of Open-Source Software
OSPtrack: A Labeled Dataset Targeting Simulated Execution of Open-Source Software
Zhuoran Tan, Christos Anagnosstopoulos, Jeremy Singer
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Open-source software serves as a foundation for the internet and the cyber supply chain, but its exploitation is becoming increasingly prevalent. While advances in vulnerability detection for OSS have been significant, prior research has largely focused on static code analysis, often neglecting runtime indicators. To address this shortfall, we created a comprehensive dataset spanning five ecosystems, capturing features generated during the execution of packages and libraries in isolated environments. The dataset includes 9,461 package reports, of which 1,962 are identified as malicious, and encompasses both static and dynamic features such as files, sockets, commands, and DNS records. Each report is labeled with verified information and detailed sub-labels for attack types, facilitating the identification of malicious indicators when source code is unavailable. This dataset supports runtime detection, enhances detection model training, and enables efficient comparative analysis across ecosystems, contributing to the strengthening of supply chain security.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections