Papers › Optimizing Nepali PDF Extraction: A Comparative Study of Parser and OCR Technologies

Optimizing Nepali PDF Extraction: A Comparative Study of Parser and OCR Technologies

5 Jul 2024arXiv:2407.04577archive 2025-07-28

Prabin Paudel, Supriya Khadka, Ranju G. C., Rahul Shah

This research compares PDF parsing and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) methods for extracting Nepali content from PDFs. PDF parsing offers fast and accurate extraction but faces challenges with non-Unicode Nepali fonts. OCR, specifically PyTesseract, overcomes these challenges, providing versatility for both digital and scanned PDFs. The study reveals that while PDF parsers are faster, their accuracy fluctuates based on PDF types. In contrast, OCRs, with a focus on PyTesseract, demonstrate consistent accuracy at the expense of slightly longer extraction times. Considering the project's emphasis on Nepali PDFs, PyTesseract emerges as the most suitable library, balancing extraction speed and accuracy.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Optical Character RecognitionOptical Character Recognition (OCR)

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

FocusSPEED

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections