Papers › Optimizing Bi-Encoder for Named Entity Recognition via Contrastive Learning

Optimizing Bi-Encoder for Named Entity Recognition via Contrastive Learning

30 Aug 2022arXiv:2208.14565archive 2025-07-28

Sheng Zhang, Hao Cheng, Jianfeng Gao, Hoifung Poon

We present a bi-encoder framework for named entity recognition (NER), which applies contrastive learning to map candidate text spans and entity types into the same vector representation space. Prior work predominantly approaches NER as sequence labeling or span classification. We instead frame NER as a representation learning problem that maximizes the similarity between the vector representations of an entity mention and its type. This makes it easy to handle nested and flat NER alike, and can better leverage noisy self-supervision signals. A major challenge to this bi-encoder formulation for NER lies in separating non-entity spans from entity mentions. Instead of explicitly labeling all non-entity spans as the same class Outside (O) as in most prior methods, we introduce a novel dynamic thresholding loss. Experiments show that our method performs well in both supervised and distantly supervised settings, for nested and flat NER alike, establishing new state of the art across standard datasets in the general domain (e.g., ACE2004, ACE2005) and high-value verticals such as biomedicine (e.g., GENIA, NCBI, BC5CDR, JNLPBA). We release the code at github.com/microsoft/binder.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2208.14565")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

microsoft/binder officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
3ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from microsoft/binder. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

contrastive_loss microsoft/binder/src/model.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · f7b4bc846f7c354c · report
contrastive_loss microsoft/binder/src/model.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 73ac50d5341bf380 · report
masked_log_softmax microsoft/binder/src/model.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · 1609cd13cd5232f1 · report
tiny_value_of_dtype microsoft/binder/src/model.py official repository ran · honoured contract MIT (permissive) · 9552b6c058655062 · report

Tasks

Contrastive LearningMetric LearningNERNamed Entity RecognitionNamed Entity Recognition (NER)Nested Named Entity RecognitionRepresentation Learningnamed-entity-recognition

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Named Entity Recognition (NER) BC5CDR BINDER F1 91.9 #1 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) JNLPBA BINDER F1 80.3 #4 of 17 Archive leaderboard report
Nested Named Entity Recognition ACE 2004 BINDER F1 88.7 #2 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Nested Named Entity Recognition ACE 2005 BINDER F1 89.5 #1 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Nested Named Entity Recognition GENIA BINDER F1 80.5 #8 of 26 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Contrastive Learning

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections