Papers › Optimal subsampling designs

Optimal subsampling designs

6 Apr 2023arXiv:2304.03019links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Henrik Imberg, Marina Axelson-Fisk, Johan Jonasson

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Subsampling is commonly used to overcome computational and economical bottlenecks in the analysis of finite populations and massive datasets. Existing methods are often limited in scope and use optimality criteria (e.g., A-optimality) with well-known deficiencies, such as lack of invariance to the measurement-scale of the data and parameterisation of the model. A unified theory of optimal subsampling design is still lacking. We present a theory of optimal design for general data subsampling problems, including finite population inference, parametric density estimation, and regression modelling. Our theory encompasses and generalises most existing methods in the field of optimal subdata selection based on unequal probability sampling and inverse probability weighting. We derive optimality conditions for a general class of optimality criteria, and present corresponding algorithms for finding optimal sampling schemes under Poisson and multinomial sampling designs. We present a novel class of transformation- and parameterisation-invariant linear optimality criteria which enjoy the best of two worlds: the computational tractability of A-optimality and invariance properties similar to D-optimality. The methodology is illustrated on an application in the traffic safety domain. In our experiments, the proposed invariant linear optimality criteria achieve 92-99% D-efficiency with 90-95% lower computational demand. In contrast, the A-optimality criterion has only 46% and 60% D-efficiency on two of the examples.

PaperPDFCode

Code

imbhe/osd officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections