Papers › Doubly Optimal No-Regret Online Learning in Strongly Monotone Games with Bandit Feedback

Doubly Optimal No-Regret Online Learning in Strongly Monotone Games with Bandit Feedback

6 Dec 2021arXiv:2112.02856archive 2025-07-28

Wenjia Ba, Tianyi Lin, Jiawei Zhang, Zhengyuan Zhou

We consider online no-regret learning in unknown games with bandit feedback, where each player can only observe its reward at each time -- determined by all players' current joint action -- rather than its gradient. We focus on the class of \textit{smooth and strongly monotone} games and study optimal no-regret learning therein. Leveraging self-concordant barrier functions, we first construct a new bandit learning algorithm and show that it achieves the single-agent optimal regret of Θ̃(n√(T)) under smooth and strongly concave reward functions (n ≥1 is the problem dimension). We then show that if each player applies this no-regret learning algorithm in strongly monotone games, the joint action converges in the \textit{last iterate} to the unique Nash equilibrium at a rate of Θ̃(nT^(-1/2)). Prior to our work, the best-known convergence rate in the same class of games is Õ(n^(2/3)T^(-1/3)) (achieved by a different algorithm), thus leaving open the problem of optimal no-regret learning algorithms (since the known lower bound is Ω(nT^(-1/2))). Our results thus settle this open problem and contribute to the broad landscape of bandit game-theoretical learning by identifying the first doubly optimal bandit learning algorithm, in that it achieves (up to log factors) both optimal regret in the single-agent learning and optimal last-iterate convergence rate in the multi-agent learning. We also present preliminary numerical results on several application problems to demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm in terms of iteration count.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

tydlin/doubly_optimal_bandits officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Logistic Regression

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections