Papers › Optimal Budgeted Rejection Sampling for Generative Models
Optimal Budgeted Rejection Sampling for Generative Models
Alexandre Verine, Muni Sreenivas Pydi, Benjamin Negrevergne, Yann Chevaleyre
Rejection sampling methods have recently been proposed to improve the performance of discriminator-based generative models. However, these methods are only optimal under an unlimited sampling budget, and are usually applied to a generator trained independently of the rejection procedure. We first propose an Optimal Budgeted Rejection Sampling (OBRS) scheme that is provably optimal with respect to \textit{any} f-divergence between the true distribution and the post-rejection distribution, for a given sampling budget. Second, we propose an end-to-end method that incorporates the sampling scheme into the training procedure to further enhance the model's overall performance. Through experiments and supporting theory, we show that the proposed methods are effective in significantly improving the quality and diversity of the samples.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Generation | CelebA 64x64 | BigGAN-OBRS | FID | 3.74 | #19 of 39 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | CelebA 64x64 | BigGAN-OBRS | Precision | 0.74 | #19 of 39 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | CelebA 64x64 | BigGAN-OBRS | Recall | 0.65 | #19 of 39 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 128x128 | BigGAN-OBRS | FID | 11.65 | #19 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 128x128 | BigGAN-OBRS | Precision | 0.27 | #19 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Generation | ImageNet 128x128 | BigGAN-OBRS | Recall | 0.46 | #19 of 23 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections