Papers › One-Step Abductive Multi-Target Learning with Diverse Noisy Samples and Its...

One-Step Abductive Multi-Target Learning with Diverse Noisy Samples and Its Application to Tumour Segmentation for Breast Cancer

20 Oct 2021arXiv:2110.10325archive 2025-07-28

Yongquan Yang, Fengling Li, Yani Wei, Jie Chen, Ning Chen, Hong Bu

Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the combination of machine learning and logical reasoning, including data-driven logical reasoning, knowledge driven machine learning and abductive learning, in inventing advanced artificial intelligence technologies. One-step abductive multi-target learning (OSAMTL), an approach inspired by abductive learning, via simply combining machine learning and logical reasoning in a one-step balanced way, has as well shown its effectiveness in handling complex noisy labels of a single noisy sample in medical histopathology whole slide image analysis (MHWSIA). However, OSAMTL is not suitable for the situation where diverse noisy samples (DiNS) are provided for a learning task. In this paper, giving definition of DiNS, we propose one-step abductive multi-target learning with DiNS (OSAMTL-DiNS) to expand the original OSAMTL to handle complex noisy labels of DiNS. Applying OSAMTL-DiNS to tumour segmentation for breast cancer in MHWSIA, we show that OSAMTL-DiNS is able to enable various state-of-the-art approaches for learning from noisy labels to achieve more rational predictions.

PaperPDFCode

Code

yongquanyang/ts-score officialmentioned in papertf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BIG-bench Machine LearningLogical Reasoning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections