Papers › On Two LZ78-style Grammars: Compression Bounds and Compressed-Space Computation

On Two LZ78-style Grammars: Compression Bounds and Compressed-Space Computation

26 May 2017arXiv:1705.09538links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Golnaz Badkobeh, Travis Gagie, Shunsuke Inenaga, Tomasz Kociumaka, Dmitry Kosolobov, Simon J. Puglisi

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We investigate two closely related LZ78-based compression schemes: LZMW (an old scheme by Miller and Wegman) and LZD (a recent variant by Goto et al.). Both LZD and LZMW naturally produce a grammar for a string of length n; we show that the size of this grammar can be larger than the size of the smallest grammar by a factor Ω(n^(1/3)) but is always within a factor O((n/logn)^(2/3)). In addition, we show that the standard algorithms using Θ(z) working space to construct the LZD and LZMW parsings, where z is the size of the parsing, work in Ω(n^(5/4)) time in the worst case. We then describe a new Las Vegas LZD/LZMW parsing algorithm that uses O (z logn) space and O(n + z log² n) time w.h.p..

PaperPDFCode

Code

bitbucket.org/dkosolobov/lzd-lzmw officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections