Papers › On the Role of Text Preprocessing in Neural Network Architectures: An Evaluation Study...

On the Role of Text Preprocessing in Neural Network Architectures: An Evaluation Study on Text Categorization and Sentiment Analysis

6 Jul 2017WS 2018 11arXiv:1707.01780archive 2025-07-28

Jose Camacho-Collados, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar

Text preprocessing is often the first step in the pipeline of a Natural Language Processing (NLP) system, with potential impact in its final performance. Despite its importance, text preprocessing has not received much attention in the deep learning literature. In this paper we investigate the impact of simple text preprocessing decisions (particularly tokenizing, lemmatizing, lowercasing and multiword grouping) on the performance of a standard neural text classifier. We perform an extensive evaluation on standard benchmarks from text categorization and sentiment analysis. While our experiments show that a simple tokenization of input text is generally adequate, they also highlight significant degrees of variability across preprocessing techniques. This reveals the importance of paying attention to this usually-overlooked step in the pipeline, particularly when comparing different models. Finally, our evaluation provides insights into the best preprocessing practices for training word embeddings.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

Code

pedrada88/preproc-textclassification officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
changji2069/Scope-Project mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Sentiment AnalysisText CategorizationText ClassificationWord Embeddings

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Sentiment Analysis IMDb CNN+LSTM Accuracy 88.9 #38 of 49 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SST-2 Binary classification CNN Accuracy 91.2 #56 of 87 Archive leaderboard report
Text Classification Ohsumed CNN+Lowercased Accuracy 36.2 #10 of 10 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections