Papers › On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGs

On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGs

17 Jun 2020NeurIPS 2020 12arXiv:2006.10201archive 2025-07-28

Ignavier Ng, AmirEmad Ghassami, Kun Zhang

Learning graphical structures based on Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) is a challenging problem, partly owing to the large search space of possible graphs. A recent line of work formulates the structure learning problem as a continuous constrained optimization task using the least squares objective and an algebraic characterization of DAGs. However, the formulation requires a hard DAG constraint and may lead to optimization difficulties. In this paper, we study the asymptotic role of the sparsity and DAG constraints for learning DAG models in the linear Gaussian and non-Gaussian cases, and investigate their usefulness in the finite sample regime. Based on the theoretical results, we formulate a likelihood-based score function, and show that one only has to apply soft sparsity and DAG constraints to learn a DAG equivalent to the ground truth DAG. This leads to an unconstrained optimization problem that is much easier to solve. Using gradient-based optimization and GPU acceleration, our procedure can easily handle thousands of nodes while retaining a high accuracy. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our proposed method and show that the DAG-penalized likelihood objective is indeed favorable over the least squares one with the hard DAG constraint.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2006.10201")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 7 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran; found in paper text by Syntology: 5 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran; community: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ignavierng/golem officialmentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

7unverified

Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

GolemModel ignavierng/golem/src/models/golem_model.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · c81d49045d06ca2f · report
count_accuracy ignavier/golem/src/utils/utils.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a6e9c529933a6c29 · report
create_dir ignavier/golem/src/utils/dir.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · dcfefca3872144bb · report
get_init_path ignavier/golem/src/utils/utils.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · cbfc596e17f36b60 · report
is_dag ignavier/golem/src/utils/utils.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · e4f1aef57de46e20 · report
load_yaml_config ignavier/golem/src/utils/config.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 1a2bc2ff671b050e · report
notears_linear xunzheng/notears/notears/linear.py community unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 8121d0e3bc3faff7 · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections