Papers › On the Performance of Hierarchical Distributed Correspondence Graphs for Efficient...

On the Performance of Hierarchical Distributed Correspondence Graphs for Efficient Symbol Grounding of Robot Instructions

29 Sep 2015Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2015 9archive 2025-07-28

Istvan Chung, Oron Propp, Matthew R. Walter, Thomas M. Howard

Natural language interfaces are powerful tools that enables humans and robots to convey information without the need for extensive training or complex graphical interfaces. Statistical techniques that employ probabilistic graphical mod- els have proven effective at interpreting symbols that represent commands and observations for robot direction-following and object manipulation. A limitation of these approaches is their inefficiency in dealing with larger and more complex symbolic representations. Herein, we present a model for language understanding that uses parse trees and environment models both to learn the structure of probabilistic graphical models and to perform inference over this learned structure for symbol grounding. This model, called the Hierarchical Distributed Correspondence Graph (HDCG), exploits information about symbols that are expressed in the corpus to construct min- imalist graphical models that are more efficient to search. In a series of comparative experiments, we demonstrate a significant improvement in efficiency without loss in accuracy over contemporary approaches for human-robot interaction.

PaperPDFCode

Code

tmhoward/h2sl mentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections