Papers › On the Generalizability of Iterative Patch Selection for Memory-Efficient...
On the Generalizability of Iterative Patch Selection for Memory-Efficient High-Resolution Image Classification
Max Riffi-Aslett, Christina Fell
Classifying large images with small or tiny regions of interest (ROI) is challenging due to computational and memory constraints. Weakly supervised memory-efficient patch selectors have achieved results comparable with strongly supervised methods. However, low signal-to-noise ratios and low entropy attention still cause overfitting. We explore these issues using a novel testbed on a memory-efficient cross-attention transformer with Iterative Patch Selection (IPS) as the patch selection module. Our testbed extends the megapixel MNIST benchmark to four smaller O2I (object-to-image) ratios ranging from 0.01% to 0.14% while keeping the canvas size fixed and introducing a noise generation component based on B\'ezier curves. Experimental results generalize the observations made on CNNs to IPS whereby the O2I threshold below which the classifier fails to generalize is affected by the training dataset size. We further observe that the magnitude of this interaction differs for each task of the Megapixel MNIST. For tasks "Maj" and "Top", the rate is at its highest, followed by tasks "Max" and "Multi" where in the latter, this rate is almost at 0. Moreover, results show that in a low data setting, tuning the patch size to be smaller relative to the ROI improves generalization, resulting in an improvement of + 15% for the megapixel MNIST and + 5% for the Swedish traffic signs dataset compared to the original object-to-patch ratios in IPS. Further outcomes indicate that the similarity between the thickness of the noise component and the digits in the megapixel MNIST gradually causes IPS to fail to generalize, contributing to previous suspicions.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections