Papers › On the dynamical stability of copper-doped lead apatite

On the dynamical stability of copper-doped lead apatite

20 Sep 2023arXiv:2309.11541links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Sun-Woo Kim, Kang Wang, Siyu Chen, Lewis J. Conway, G. Lucian Pascut, Ion Errea, Chris J. Pickard, Bartomeu Monserrat

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The recent claim of room temperature superconductivity in a copper-doped lead apatite compound, called LK-99, has sparked remarkable interest and controversy. Subsequent experiments have largely failed to reproduce the claimed superconductivity, while theoretical works have identified multiple key features including strong electronic correlation, structural instabilities, and dopability constraints. A puzzling claim of several recent theoretical studies is that both parent and copper-doped lead apatite structures are dynamically unstable at the harmonic level, questioning decades of experimental reports of the parent compound structures and the recently proposed copper-doped structures. In this work, we demonstrate that both parent and copper-doped lead apatite structures are dynamically stable at room temperature. Anharmonic phonon-phonon interactions play a key role in stabilizing some copper-doped phases, while most phases are largely stable even at the harmonic level. We also show that dynamical stability depends on both volume and correlation strength, suggesting controllable ways of exploring the copper-doped lead apatite structural phase diagram. Our results fully reconcile the theoretical description of the structures of both parent and copper-doped lead apatite with experiment.

PaperPDFCode

Code

monserratlab/lk99_structures officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections