Papers › On the Divergence of First Order Resonance Widths at Low Eccentricities

On the Divergence of First Order Resonance Widths at Low Eccentricities

16 Jun 2020arXiv:2006.09452links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Renu Malhotra, Nan Zhang

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Orbital resonances play an important role in the dynamics of planetary systems. Classical theoretical analyses found in textbooks report that libration widths of first order mean motion resonances diverge for nearly circular orbits. Here we examine the nature of this divergence with a non-perturbative analysis of a few first order resonances interior to a Jupiter-mass planet. We show that a first order resonance has two branches, the pericentric and the apocentric resonance zone. As the eccentricity approaches zero, the centers of these zones diverge away from the nominal resonance location but their widths shrink. We also report a novel finding of "bridges" between adjacent first order resonances: at low eccentricities, the apocentric libration zone of a first order resonance smoothly connects with the pericentric libration zone of the neighboring first order resonance. These bridges may facilitate resonant migration across large radial distances in planetary systems, entirely in the low eccentricity regime.

PaperPDFCode

Code

renumalhotra/2020-first-order-mmrs officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections