Papers › On the Development of a Large Scale Corpus for Native Language Identification

On the Development of a Large Scale Corpus for Native Language Identification

10 Dec 2018TLT17 2018 12archive 2025-07-28

Thomas Hudson, Sardar Jaf

Native Language Identification (NLI) is the task of identifying an author’s native language from their writings in a second language. In this paper, we introduce a new corpus (italki), which is larger than the current corpora. It can be used for training machine learning based systems for classifying and identifying the native language of authors of English text. To examine the usefulness of italki, we evaluate it by using it to train and test some of the well performing NLI systems presented in the 2017 NLI shared task. In this paper, we present some aspects of italki. We show the impact of the variation of italki’s training dataset size of some languages on systems performance. From our empirical finding, we highlight the potential of italki as a large scale corpus for training machine learning classifiers for classifying the native language of authors from their written English text. We obtained promising results that show the potential of italki to improve the performance of current NLI systems. More importantly, we found that training the current NLI systems on italki generalize better than training them on the current corpora.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ghomasHudson/italkiCorpus mentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BIG-bench Machine LearningLanguage IdentificationNative Language Identification

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

italki NLI

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections