Papers › Attributional Robustness Training using Input-Gradient Spatial Alignment
Attributional Robustness Training using Input-Gradient Spatial Alignment
Mayank Singh, Nupur Kumari, Puneet Mangla, Abhishek Sinha, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian, Balaji Krishnamurthy
Interpretability is an emerging area of research in trustworthy machine learning. Safe deployment of machine learning system mandates that the prediction and its explanation be reliable and robust. Recently, it has been shown that the explanations could be manipulated easily by adding visually imperceptible perturbations to the input while keeping the model's prediction intact. In this work, we study the problem of attributional robustness (i.e. models having robust explanations) by showing an upper bound for attributional vulnerability in terms of spatial correlation between the input image and its explanation map. We propose a training methodology that learns robust features by minimizing this upper bound using soft-margin triplet loss. Our methodology of robust attribution training (\textit{ART}) achieves the new state-of-the-art attributional robustness measure by a margin of ≈ 6-18 % on several standard datasets, ie. SVHN, CIFAR-10 and GTSRB. We further show the utility of the proposed robust training technique (\textit{ART}) in the downstream task of weakly supervised object localization by achieving the new state-of-the-art performance on CUB-200 dataset.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weakly-Supervised Object Localization | CUB-200-2011 | ART | Top-1 Error Rate | 34.8 | #9 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Weakly-Supervised Object Localization | CUB-200-2011 | ART | Top-1 Localization Accuracy | 65.22 | #9 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections