Papers › On the Art and Science of Machine Learning Explanations

On the Art and Science of Machine Learning Explanations

5 Oct 2018arXiv:1810.02909archive 2025-07-28

Patrick Hall

This text discusses several popular explanatory methods that go beyond the error measurements and plots traditionally used to assess machine learning models. Some of the explanatory methods are accepted tools of the trade while others are rigorously derived and backed by long-standing theory. The methods, decision tree surrogate models, individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME), partial dependence plots, and Shapley explanations, vary in terms of scope, fidelity, and suitable application domain. Along with descriptions of these methods, this text presents real-world usage recommendations supported by a use case and public, in-depth software examples for reproducibility.

PaperPDFCode

Code

jphall663/interpretable_machine_learning_with_python officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
jphall663/jsm_2018_paper officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
h2oai/mli-resources officialmentioned in paper report
jphall663/hc_ml mentioned on GitHub report
jphall663/kdd_2019 mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BIG-bench Machine Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections