Papers › On "Optimal" h-Independent Convergence of Parareal and MGRIT using Runge-Kutta Time Integration

On "Optimal" h-Independent Convergence of Parareal and MGRIT using Runge-Kutta Time Integration

16 Jun 2019arXiv:1906.06672links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Stephanie Friedhoff, Ben S. Southworth

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Although convergence of the Parareal and multigrid-reduction-in-time (MGRIT) parallel-in-time algorithms is well studied, results on their optimality is limited. Appealling to recently derived tight bounds of two-level Parareal and MGRIT convergence, this paper proves (or disproves) hₓ- and hₜ-independent convergence of two-level Parareal and MGRIT, for linear problems of the form 𝐮′(t) + ℒ𝐮(t) = f(t), where ℒ is symmetric positive definite and Runge-Kutta time integration is used. The theory presented in this paper also encompasses analysis of some modified Parareal algorithms, such as the θ-Parareal method, and shows that not all Runge-Kutta schemes are equal from the perspective of parallel-in-time. Some schemes, particularly L-stable methods, offer significantly better convergence than others as they are guaranteed to converge rapidly at both limits of small and large hₜξ, where ξ denotes an eigenvalue of ℒ and hₜ time-step size. On the other hand, some schemes do not obtain h-optimal convergence, and two-level convergence is restricted to certain regimes. In certain cases, an 𝒪(1) factor change in time step hₜ or coarsening factor k can be the difference between convergence factors ρ≈0.02 and divergence! The analysis is extended to skew symmetric operators as well, which cannot obtain h-independent convergence and, in fact, will generally not converge for a sufficiently large number of time steps. Numerical results confirm the analysis in practice and emphasize the importance of a priori analysis in choosing an effective coarse-grid scheme and coarsening factor. A Mathematica notebook to perform a priori two-grid analysis is available at https://github.com/XBraid/xbraid-convergence-est.

PaperPDFCode

Code

XBraid/xbraid-convergence-est officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections