Papers › Omega results for cubic field counts via lower-order terms in the one-level density
Omega results for cubic field counts via lower-order terms in the one-level density
Peter J. Cho, Daniel Fiorilli, Yoonbok Lee, Anders Södergren
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In this paper we obtain a precise formula for the 1-level density of L-functions attached to non-Galois cubic Dedekind zeta functions. We find a secondary term which is unique to this context, in the sense that no lower-order term of this shape has appeared in previously studied families. The presence of this new term allows us to deduce an omega result for cubic field counting functions, under the assumption of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis. We also investigate the associated L-functions Ratios Conjecture, and find that it does not predict this new lower-order term. Taking into account the secondary term in Roberts' Conjecture, we refine the Ratios Conjecture to one which captures this new term. Finally, we show that any improvement in the exponent of the error term of the recent Bhargava--Taniguchi--Thorne cubic field counting estimate would imply that the best possible error term in the refined Ratios Conjecture is O_ε(X^(-1/3+ε)). This is in opposition with all previously studied families, in which the expected error in the Ratios Conjecture prediction for the 1-level density is O_ε(X^(-1/2+ε)).
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections