Papers › OBSTransformer: A Deep-Learning Seismic Phase Picker for OBS Data Using Automated...
OBSTransformer: A Deep-Learning Seismic Phase Picker for OBS Data Using Automated Labelling and Transfer Learning
Alireza Niksejel, Miao Zhang
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Accurate seismic phase detection and onset picking are fundamental to seismological studies. Supervised deep-learning phase pickers have shown promise with excellent performance on land seismic data. Although it may be acceptable to apply them to OBS (Ocean Bottom Seismometers) data that are indispensable for studying ocean regions, they suffer from a significant performance drop. In this study, we develop a generalised transfer-learned OBS phase picker - OBSTransformer, based on automated labelling and transfer learning. First, we compile a comprehensive dataset of catalogued earthquakes recorded by 423 OBSs from 11 temporary deployments worldwide. Through automated processes, we label the P and S phases of these earthquakes by analysing the consistency of at least three arrivals from four widely used machine learning pickers (EqTransformer, PhaseNet, Generalized Phase Detection, and PickNet), as well as the AIC picker. This results in an inclusive OBS dataset containing ~36,000 earthquake samples. Subsequently, we employ this dataset for transfer learning and utilize a well-trained land machine learning model - EqTransformer as our base model. Moreover, we extract 25,000 OBS noise samples from the same OBS networks using the Kurtosis method, which are then used for model training alongside the labelled earthquake samples. Using three groups of test datasets at sub-global, regional, and local scales, we demonstrate that OBSTransformer outperforms EqTransformer. Particularly, the P and S recall rates at large distances (>200 km) are increased by 68% and 76%, respectively. Our extensive tests and comparisons demonstrate that OBSTransformer is less dependent on the detection/picking thresholds and is more robust to noise levels.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections