Papers › Numerical study of hypergraph product codes

Numerical study of hypergraph product codes

8 Oct 2018arXiv:1810.03681links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Antoine Grospellier, Anirudh Krishna

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Hypergraph product codes introduced by Tillich and Z\'emor are a class of quantum LDPC codes with constant rate and distance scaling with the square-root of the block size. Quantum expander codes, a subclass of these codes, can be decoded using the linear time small-set-flip algorithm of Leverrier, Tillich and Z\'emor. In this paper, we numerically estimate the performance for the hypergraph product codes under independent bit and phase flip noise. We focus on two families of hypergraph product codes. The first family has rate 1/61 ∼1.6%, has qubits of weight $10$ or $12$ and stabilizers of weight $11$. We report a threshold near 4.6% for the small-set-flip decoder. We also show that for similar rate, the performance of the hypergraph product is better than the performance of the toric code as soon as we deal with more than $500$ logical qubits and that for $3600$ logical qubits, the logical error rate for the hypergraph product code is several orders of magnitude smaller. The second family has rate $0.2$, qubits of weight $10$ and $20$ and stabilizers of weight $15$. We report a threshold near 2% for the small-set-flip decoder.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections