Papers › Numerical considerations and a new implementation for ICS

Numerical considerations and a new implementation for ICS

5 Jul 2022arXiv:2207.02131links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Aurore Archimbaud, Zlatko Drmač, Klaus Nordhausen, Una Radojičić, Anne Ruiz-Gazen

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Invariant Coordinate Selection (ICS) is a multivariate data transformation and a dimension reduction method that can be useful in many different contexts. It can be used for outlier detection or cluster identification, and can be seen as an independent component or a non-Gaussian component analysis method. The usual implementation of ICS is based on a joint diagonalization of two scatter matrices, and may be numerically unstable in some ill-conditioned situations. We focus on one-step M-scatter matrices and propose a new implementation of ICS based on a pivoted QR factorization of the centered data set. This factorization avoids the direct computation of the scatter matrices and their inverse and brings numerical stability to the algorithm. Furthermore, the row and column pivoting leads to a rank revealing procedure that allows computation of ICS when the scatter matrices are not full rank. Several artificial and real data sets illustrate the interest of using the new implementation compared to the original one.

PaperPDFCode

Code

auroreaa/ncics officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections