Papers › NPENAS: Neural Predictor Guided Evolution for Neural Architecture Search

NPENAS: Neural Predictor Guided Evolution for Neural Architecture Search

28 Mar 2020arXiv:2003.12857archive 2025-07-28

Chen Wei, Chuang Niu, Yiping Tang, Yue Wang, Haihong Hu, Jimin Liang

Neural architecture search (NAS) is a promising method for automatically design neural architectures. NAS adopts a search strategy to explore the predefined search space to find outstanding performance architecture with the minimum searching costs. Bayesian optimization and evolutionary algorithms are two commonly used search strategies, but they suffer from computationally expensive, challenge to implement or inefficient exploration ability. In this paper, we propose a neural predictor guided evolutionary algorithm to enhance the exploration ability of EA for NAS (NPENAS) and design two kinds of neural predictors. The first predictor is defined from Bayesian optimization and we propose a graph-based uncertainty estimation network as a surrogate model that is easy to implement and computationally efficient. The second predictor is a graph-based neural network that directly outputs the performance prediction of the input neural architecture. The NPENAS using the two neural predictors are denoted as NPENAS-BO and NPENAS-NP respectively. In addition, we introduce a new random architecture sampling method to overcome the drawbacks of the existing sampling method. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of NPENAS. Quantitative results on three NAS search spaces indicate that both NPENAS-BO and NPENAS-NP outperform most existing NAS algorithms, with NPENAS-BO achieving state-of-the-art performance on NASBench-201 and NPENAS-NP on NASBench-101 and DARTS, respectively.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from auroua/NPENASv1. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections