Papers › Nonparametric modal regression with missing response observations

Nonparametric modal regression with missing response observations

7 Apr 2025arXiv:2504.04914links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Ana Pérez-González, Tomás R. Cotos-Yáñez, Rosa M. Crujeiras

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Modal regression has emerged as a flexible alternative to classical regression models when the conditional mean or median are unable to adequately capture the underlying relation between a response and a predictor variable. This approach is particularly useful when the conditional distribution of the response given the covariate presents several modes, so the suitable regression function is a multifunction. In recent years, some proposals have addressed modal (smooth) regression estimation using kernel methods. In addition, some remarkable extensions to deal with censored, dependent or circular data have been also introduced. However, the case of incomplete samples due to missingness has not been studied in the literature. This paper adapts the nonparametric modal regression tools to handle missing observations in the response, investigating several imputation approaches through an extensive simulation study. The performance in practice of our proposals are also illustrated with two real--data examples.

PaperPDFCode

Code

TomasCotos/NP-Modal-Reg-Missing-Y officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections