Papers › Characterization of Excess Risk for Locally Strongly Convex Population Risk

Characterization of Excess Risk for Locally Strongly Convex Population Risk

4 Dec 2020arXiv:2012.02456archive 2025-07-28

Mingyang Yi, Ruoyu Wang, Zhi-Ming Ma

We establish upper bounds for the expected excess risk of models trained by proper iterative algorithms which approximate the local minima. Unlike the results built upon the strong globally strongly convexity or global growth conditions e.g., PL-inequality, we only require the population risk to be \emph{locally} strongly convex around its local minima. Concretely, our bound under convex problems is of order 𝒪̃(1/n). For non-convex problems with d model parameters such that d/n is smaller than a threshold independent of n, the order of 𝒪̃(1/n) can be maintained if the empirical risk has no spurious local minima with high probability. Moreover, the bound for non-convex problem becomes 𝒪̃(1/√(n)) without such assumption. Our results are derived via algorithmic stability and characterization of the empirical risk's landscape. Compared with the existing algorithmic stability based results, our bounds are dimensional insensitive and without restrictions on the algorithm's implementation, learning rate, and the number of iterations. Our bounds underscore that with locally strongly convex population risk, the models trained by any proper iterative algorithm can generalize well, even for non-convex problems, and d is large.

PaperPDFCode

Code

kuangliu/pytorch-cifar officialmentioned in paperpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections