Papers › Noisy neighbours: inference biases from overlapping gravitational-wave signals
Noisy neighbours: inference biases from overlapping gravitational-wave signals
Andrea Antonelli, Ollie Burke, Jonathan R. Gair
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Understanding and dealing with inference biases in gravitational-wave (GW) parameter estimation when a plethora of signals are present in the data is one of the key challenges for the analysis of data from future GW detectors. Working within the linear signal approximation, we describe generic metrics to predict inference biases on GW source parameters in the presence of confusion noise from unfitted foregrounds, from overlapping signals that coalesce close in time to one another, and from residuals of other signals that have been incorrectly fitted out. We illustrate the formalism with simplified, yet realistic, scenarios appropriate to third-generation ground-based (Einstein Telescope) and space-based (LISA) detectors, and demonstrate its validity against Monte-Carlo simulations. We find it to be a reliable tool to cheaply predict the extent and direction of the biases. Finally, we show how this formalism can be used to correct for biases that arise in the sequential characterisation of multiple sources in a single data set, which could be a valuable tool to use within a global-fit analysis pipeline.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections