Papers › New results in canonical polyadic decomposition over finite fields
New results in canonical polyadic decomposition over finite fields
Jason Yang
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Canonical polyadic decomposition (CPD) is at the core of fast matrix multiplication, a computational problem with widespread implications across several seemingly unrelated problems in computer science. Much recent progress in this field has used randomized heuristic search to find new CPDs, often over a finite field. However, if these techniques fail to find a CPD with low enough rank, they cannot prove that no such CPD exists. Consequently, these methods fail to resolve certain long-standing questions, such as whether the tensor corresponding to 3×3 matrix multiplication has rank less than 23. To make progress on these problems, we develop a novel algorithm that preserves exactness, i.e. they can provably verify whether or not a given tensor has a specified rank. Compared to brute force, when searching for a rank-R CPD of a n₀×…×n_(D-1)-shaped tensor over a finite field 𝔽, where n₀≥…≥n_(D-1), our algorithm saves a multiplicative factor of roughly |𝔽|^(R(n₀-1)+n₀(∑_(d≥1) n_d)). Additionally, our algorithm runs in polynomial time. We also find a novel algorithm to search border CPDs, a variant of CPDs that is also important in fast matrix multiplication. Finally, we study the maximum rank problem and give new upper and lower bounds, both for families of tensor shapes and specific shapes. Although our CPD search algorithms are still too slow to resolve the rank of 3×3 matrix multiplication, we are able to utilize them in this problem by adding extra search pruners that do not affect exactness or increase asymptotic running time.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections