Papers › Neural Relational Inference for Interacting Systems

Neural Relational Inference for Interacting Systems

13 Feb 2018ICML 2018 7arXiv:1802.04687archive 2025-07-28

Thomas Kipf, Ethan Fetaya, Kuan-Chieh Wang, Max Welling, Richard Zemel

Interacting systems are prevalent in nature, from dynamical systems in physics to complex societal dynamics. The interplay of components can give rise to complex behavior, which can often be explained using a simple model of the system's constituent parts. In this work, we introduce the neural relational inference (NRI) model: an unsupervised model that learns to infer interactions while simultaneously learning the dynamics purely from observational data. Our model takes the form of a variational auto-encoder, in which the latent code represents the underlying interaction graph and the reconstruction is based on graph neural networks. In experiments on simulated physical systems, we show that our NRI model can accurately recover ground-truth interactions in an unsupervised manner. We further demonstrate that we can find an interpretable structure and predict complex dynamics in real motion capture and sports tracking data.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1802.04687")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 6 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran; community (archive-listed): 5 samples from 2 repositories, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

ethanfetaya/nri officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
ELEMKEP/bsc_lcs mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
ipeter50/graph_ode mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
loeweX/AmortizedCausalDiscovery mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
mariel-pettee/choreo-graph mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
mitmul/chainer-nri mentioned on GitHub report
mkofinas/locs mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
pairlab/v-cdn mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
quizzicalkudu/curly-spork mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 1 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

generate_dataset ethanfetaya/nri/data/generate_dataset.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 12d0d79170d76415 · report
get_sender_receiver mitmul/chainer-nri/utils/visualize_results.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract MIT (permissive) · aac319f56fd6feff · report
binary_concrete quizzicalkudu/curly-spork/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · a0bc850b6e4e06c3 · report
binary_concrete_sample quizzicalkudu/curly-spork/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 827289450cb41f39 · report
my_softmax quizzicalkudu/curly-spork/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 9310c1921882d972 · report
nll_gaussian quizzicalkudu/curly-spork/lstm_baseline.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 5de9491cb82f0f38 · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections