Papers › Neural Latent Extractive Document Summarization

Neural Latent Extractive Document Summarization

22 Aug 2018EMNLP 2018 10arXiv:1808.07187archive 2025-07-28

Xingxing Zhang, Mirella Lapata, Furu Wei, Ming Zhou

Extractive summarization models require sentence-level labels, which are usually created heuristically (e.g., with rule-based methods) given that most summarization datasets only have document-summary pairs. Since these labels might be suboptimal, we propose a latent variable extractive model where sentences are viewed as latent variables and sentences with activated variables are used to infer gold summaries. During training the loss comes \emph{directly} from gold summaries. Experiments on the CNN/Dailymail dataset show that our model improves over a strong extractive baseline trained on heuristically approximated labels and also performs competitively to several recent models.

PaperPDFConference PDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Document SummarizationExtractive Document SummarizationExtractive SummarizationExtractive Text SummarizationSentence

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Extractive Text Summarization CNN / Daily Mail Latent ROUGE-1 41.05 #12 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Extractive Text Summarization CNN / Daily Mail Latent ROUGE-2 18.77 #12 of 15 Archive leaderboard report
Extractive Text Summarization CNN / Daily Mail Latent ROUGE-L 37.54 #12 of 15 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections