Papers › NeuGuard: Lightweight Neuron-Guided Defense against Membership Inference Attacks
NeuGuard: Lightweight Neuron-Guided Defense against Membership Inference Attacks
Nuo Xu, Binghui Wang, Ran Ran, Wujie Wen, Parv Venkitasubramaniam
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) against machine learning models can lead to serious privacy risks for the training dataset used in the model training. In this paper, we propose a novel and effective Neuron-Guided Defense method named NeuGuard against membership inference attacks (MIAs). We identify a key weakness in existing defense mechanisms against MIAs wherein they cannot simultaneously defend against two commonly used neural network based MIAs, indicating that these two attacks should be separately evaluated to assure the defense effectiveness. We propose NeuGuard, a new defense approach that jointly controls the output and inner neurons' activation with the object to guide the model output of training set and testing set to have close distributions. NeuGuard consists of class-wise variance minimization targeting restricting the final output neurons and layer-wise balanced output control aiming to constrain the inner neurons in each layer. We evaluate NeuGuard and compare it with state-of-the-art defenses against two neural network based MIAs, five strongest metric based MIAs including the newly proposed label-only MIA on three benchmark datasets. Results show that NeuGuard outperforms the state-of-the-art defenses by offering much improved utility-privacy trade-off, generality, and overhead.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections