Papers › Negotiated Representations to Prevent Forgetting in Machine Learning Applications

Negotiated Representations to Prevent Forgetting in Machine Learning Applications

30 Nov 2023arXiv:2312.00237archive 2025-07-28

Nuri Korhan, Ceren Öner

Catastrophic forgetting is a significant challenge in the field of machine learning, particularly in neural networks. When a neural network learns to perform well on a new task, it often forgets its previously acquired knowledge or experiences. This phenomenon occurs because the network adjusts its weights and connections to minimize the loss on the new task, which can inadvertently overwrite or disrupt the representations that were crucial for the previous tasks. As a result, the the performance of the network on earlier tasks deteriorates, limiting its ability to learn and adapt to a sequence of tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel method for preventing catastrophic forgetting in machine learning applications, specifically focusing on neural networks. Our approach aims to preserve the knowledge of the network across multiple tasks while still allowing it to learn new information effectively. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by conducting experiments on various benchmark datasets, including Split MNIST, Split CIFAR10, Split Fashion MNIST, and Split CIFAR100. These datasets are created by dividing the original datasets into separate, non overlapping tasks, simulating a continual learning scenario where the model needs to learn multiple tasks sequentially without forgetting the previous ones. Our proposed method tackles the catastrophic forgetting problem by incorporating negotiated representations into the learning process, which allows the model to maintain a balance between retaining past experiences and adapting to new tasks. By evaluating our method on these challenging datasets, we aim to showcase its potential for addressing catastrophic forgetting and improving the performance of neural networks in continual learning settings.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Continual LearningImage Classification

2 archive task tags without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification Split CIFAR-10 Model with negotiation paradigm Percentage Average accuracy - 5 tasks 46.5 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Split Fashion M-NIST Model with negotiation paradigm Percentage Average accuracy - 5 tasks 54.8 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification Split M-NIST Model with negotiation paradigm Percentage Average accuracy - 5 tasks 82.3 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification split CIFAR-100 Model with negotiation paradigm Percentage Average accuracy - 5 tasks 34.9 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

ConvolutionNON

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections