Papers › NegBERT: A Transfer Learning Approach for Negation Detection and Scope Resolution
NegBERT: A Transfer Learning Approach for Negation Detection and Scope Resolution
Aditya Khandelwal, Suraj Sawant
Negation is an important characteristic of language, and a major component of information extraction from text. This subtask is of considerable importance to the biomedical domain. Over the years, multiple approaches have been explored to address this problem: Rule-based systems, Machine Learning classifiers, Conditional Random Field Models, CNNs and more recently BiLSTMs. In this paper, we look at applying Transfer Learning to this problem. First, we extensively review previous literature addressing Negation Detection and Scope Resolution across the 3 datasets that have gained popularity over the years: the BioScope Corpus, the Sherlock dataset, and the SFU Review Corpus. We then explore the decision choices involved with using BERT, a popular transfer learning model, for this task, and report state-of-the-art results for scope resolution across all 3 datasets. Our model, referred to as NegBERT, achieves a token level F1 score on scope resolution of 92.36 on the Sherlock dataset, 95.68 on the BioScope Abstracts subcorpus, 91.24 on the BioScope Full Papers subcorpus, 90.95 on the SFU Review Corpus, outperforming the previous state-of-the-art systems by a significant margin. We also analyze the model's generalizability to datasets on which it is not trained.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negation Scope Resolution | *sem 2012 Shared Task: Sherlock Dataset | NegBERT | F1 | 92.36 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Negation Scope Resolution | BioScope : Abstracts | NegBERT | F1 | 95.68 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Negation Scope Resolution | BioScope : Full Papers | NegBERT | F1 | 91.24 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Negation Scope Resolution | SFU Review Corpus | NegBERT | F1 | 90.95 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Negation and Speculation Cue Detection | *sem 2012 Shared Task: Sherlock Dataset | NegBERT | F1 | 92.94 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections