Papers › Needle Segmentation Using GAN: Restoring Thin Instrument Visibility in Robotic Ultrasound
Needle Segmentation Using GAN: Restoring Thin Instrument Visibility in Robotic Ultrasound
Zhongliang Jiang, Xuesong Li, Xiangyu Chu, Angelos Karlas, Yuan Bi, Yingsheng Cheng, K. W. Samuel Au, Nassir Navab
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle insertion is a standard procedure employed in both biopsy and ablation in clinical practices. However, due to the complex interaction between tissue and instrument, the needle may deviate from the in-plane view, resulting in a lack of close monitoring of the percutaneous needle. To address this challenge, we introduce a robot-assisted ultrasound (US) imaging system designed to seamlessly monitor the insertion process and autonomously restore the visibility of the inserted instrument when misalignment happens. To this end, the adversarial structure is presented to encourage the generation of segmentation masks that align consistently with the ground truth in high-order space. This study also systematically investigates the effects on segmentation performance by exploring various training loss functions and their combinations. When misalignment between the probe and the percutaneous needle is detected, the robot is triggered to perform transverse searching to optimize the positional and rotational adjustment to restore needle visibility. The experimental results on ex-vivo porcine samples demonstrate that the proposed method can precisely segment the percutaneous needle (with a tip error of 0.37±0.29mm and an angle error of 1.19±0.29°). Furthermore, the needle appearance can be successfully restored under the repositioned probe pose in all 45 trials, with repositioning errors of 1.51±0.95mm and 1.25±0.79°. from latex to text with math symbols
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections