Papers › Navigating Knowledge Management Implementation Success in Government Organizations: A...

Navigating Knowledge Management Implementation Success in Government Organizations: A type-2 fuzzy approach

18 Jun 2024arXiv:2406.12345archive 2025-07-28

Saman Foroutani, Nasim Fahimian, Reyhaneh Jalalinejad, Morteza Hezarkhani, Samaneh Mahmoudi, Behrooz Gharleghi

Optimal information and knowledge management is crucial for organizations to achieve their objectives efficiently. As a rare and valuable resource, effective knowledge management provides a strategic advantage and has become a key determinant of organizational success. The study aims to identify critical success and failure factors for implementing knowledge management systems in government organizations. This research employs a descriptive survey methodology, collecting data through random interviews and questionnaires. The study highlights the critical success factors for knowledge management systems in government organizations, including cooperation, an open atmosphere, staff training, creativity and innovation, removal of organizational constraints, reward policies, role modeling, and focus. Conversely, failure to consider formality, staff participation, collaboration technologies, network and hardware infrastructure, complexity, IT staff, and trust can pose significant obstacles to successful implementation.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

liangrunflora/slow-fast-sampling mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

DescriptiveManagement

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections