Papers › N2D: (Not Too) Deep Clustering via Clustering the Local Manifold of an Autoencoded Embedding

N2D: (Not Too) Deep Clustering via Clustering the Local Manifold of an Autoencoded Embedding

16 Aug 2019arXiv:1908.05968archive 2025-07-28

Ryan McConville, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Robert J. Piechocki, Ian Craddock

Deep clustering has increasingly been demonstrating superiority over conventional shallow clustering algorithms. Deep clustering algorithms usually combine representation learning with deep neural networks to achieve this performance, typically optimizing a clustering and non-clustering loss. In such cases, an autoencoder is typically connected with a clustering network, and the final clustering is jointly learned by both the autoencoder and clustering network. Instead, we propose to learn an autoencoded embedding and then search this further for the underlying manifold. For simplicity, we then cluster this with a shallow clustering algorithm, rather than a deeper network. We study a number of local and global manifold learning methods on both the raw data and autoencoded embedding, concluding that UMAP in our framework is best able to find the most clusterable manifold in the embedding, suggesting local manifold learning on an autoencoded embedding is effective for discovering higher quality discovering clusters. We quantitatively show across a range of image and time-series datasets that our method has competitive performance against the latest deep clustering algorithms, including out-performing current state-of-the-art on several. We postulate that these results show a promising research direction for deep clustering. The code can be found at https://github.com/rymc/n2d

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1908.05968")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 4 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 2 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran; community (archive-listed): 2 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

rymc/n2d officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report
josephsdavid/N2D mentioned on GitHubtf report
shyhyawJou/N2D-Pytorch mentioned on GitHubpytorchGPL-3.0 report
talwiener/ds_hw3 mentioned on GitHubtfGPL-3.0 report
talwiener/n2d mentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2unverified

Licence: 2 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

load_pendigits rymc/n2d/datasets.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · 29b317a560e0783f · report
load_usps rymc/n2d/datasets.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong GPL-3.0 (copyleft) · pointer only · dcfc17065b8e6966 · report
best_cluster_fit josephsdavid/N2D/n2d/N2D.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 59c55deb36829817 · report
cluster_acc josephsdavid/N2D/n2d/N2D.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 4efdad7e624a3c0d · report

Tasks

ClusteringDeep ClusteringImage ClusteringRepresentation LearningTime SeriesTime Series AnalysisTime Series Clustering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Clustering Fashion-MNIST N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.672 #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering Fashion-MNIST N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.684 #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering HAR N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.801 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering HAR N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.683 #2 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering MNIST-full N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.987 #3 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering MNIST-full N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.964 #3 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering MNIST-test N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.948 #9 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering MNIST-test N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.882 #9 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering USPS N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.958 #10 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering USPS N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.901 #10 of 16 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering pendigits N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.885 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Image Clustering pendigits N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.863 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections